CLOSING FEEDBACK LOOPS IN SINDUKOT

K
Kanchana Sthanumurthy 11 August 2017

Sindukot, in Sindhupalchowk district, is a mere 70 kilometers from Kathmandu, but the roads leading to the district are so heavily potholed and narrow that the journey takes over three hours from Kathmandu by car.

In this beautiful community of terraced hills dotted with houses, our Citizen Helpdesk team has been working for over two years to gather information from citizens on their key concerns and working to close feedback loops related to critical priorities. The focus initially was earthquake relief and recovery, but the Helpdesks have now shifted the focus to foreign labor migration because districts like Sindhupalchowk are among the most affected by migration in the country. This is demonstrated in the local economy- foreign remittances account for a massive 22% of household income in the district according to the International Organization for Migration.

Recently, we arrived in Sindukot for the first community meeting held by Sindhupalchowk’s new Community Frontline Associate (CFA) Santosh Sigdel, a radio journalist born and raised in the district. The role of local CFAs is to gather information from locals on their collective issues, and close the feedback loop by disseminating information to citizens, answering their queries and connecting them to local resources. Community meetings are an important way for CFAs to get a sense of citizens’ most significant problems.

The official community meeting- part of the feedback process- was held in one of Sindukot’s small community schools. As it is the beginning of the harvest season, the community meeting turnout was markedly lower than usual, although the meeting was still attended by 35 people. These included Sindhupalchowk’s elected ward representative, Sudarshan Luitel, as well as the ward’s health representative and local school representative.

After introductions, community members were eager to speak about the challenges they face on a daily basis. The major topics of discussion centered around migration and reconstruction-related issues and drew out difficult concerns related to decision-making, trust in manpower agencies, government responsiveness and family dynamics. For example:

  • A man got up to explain that a manpower agency had been holding his son’s passport illegally for the last six months, making it impossible for him to travel abroad for work, but there seemed to be few ways to address the issue.
  • One community member had worked in Dubai for 18 months. After some time, his boss allowed him to return home for a brief visit in Nepal. When he was preparing to return to Dubai, he learned that his visa had been revoked and he was going to be fired for unspecified reasons, without any explanation. But given financial imperatives he is now preparing to leave for Kuwait. Suman was deported from Dubai and fired with virtually no explanation.
  • Another community member had recently returned from foreign employment in Malaysia. He had used local agents who connected him to a manpower agency, where he signed a contract and took out various loans to travel. When he reached Malaysia, however, he discovered that the work was primarily hard labor that was not part of his contract. He resigned after a few months as a result but has not yet been able to collect any compensation from the Nepali Department of Foreign Employment for his losses. He is reluctant to report his case, as the agents who referred him to the manpower agency are family members.
  • A number of people also spoke about houses they had built after the earthquake that did not meet the government’s criteria for reconstruction—and these survivors were now being denied reconstruction funds. Many had been given a small amount to start their reconstruction, but now had insufficient money or land to finish constructing their houses.

Community members listened intently as others spoke, and affirmed their comments. One of the women had brought her toddler son to the meeting, whose giggles and play brought some levity to the meeting. Another older lady had brought a scythe with her, which she rapped absently against the table while listening.

Towards the end of the meeting, Santosh passed out the latest Citizen Helpdesk Bulletin that provides detailed answers to questions brought up in earlier community meetings about migration and contact details for officials to be in touch with about community concerns. Mr. Luitel, the ward representative, promised to address some of the residents’ problems regarding migration and reconstruction. The key to continued trust in this process will be the extent to which he is able to do so- effective feedback loops depend on the political will of key officials, but also on the larger political and governance context. Sindupalchowk recently carried out local elections for the first time in almost 20 years, and the new local bodies this process created will play a critical role in meeting citizen’s needs. Santosh will now be coordinating more with Mr. Luitel and other local ward representatives to ensure that the new federal structure improves feedback loops.

Buy-in for the Helpdesks also requires maximum exposure to the process. A local radio journalist recorded the meeting, and will be broadcasting the recording on the local radio station in the coming days to ensure greater awareness about these issues.

Both reconstruction and foreign labor migration challenges plague this district, but residents appear to have greater difficulties speaking freely about their issues with foreign labor migration at these meetings. Residents face greater social pressure when talking about foreign labor migration, as migrants leave the community to make money- and if there are problems this can be seen as shameful.

To address these concerns, the Citizen Helpdesks are working to increase support systems for migrant workers. For example, just days before the community meeting, Accountability Lab organized a migration stakeholders’ meeting to connect migrant workers with differentiated types of assistance, including legal counseling and support for women migrant workers. Stakeholders included Lapsoz (legal counseling for migrant workers); Pourakhi Nepal (support for women migrant workers); and Amnesty International (channeling ideas into formal policy on these issues).

As the Citizen Helpdesk program expands, providing communities with the support they need and encouraging citizens to be open and honest about their experiences remains very important. It is only then that feedback loops can be created with power-holders to ensure accountability.

 

Photos by Shweta Gulati

21 August 2017

Building trust and underpinning justice in Liberia

Establishing a legal system that serves everyone equally is proving a long and difficult process. But, community mediation efforts are ...

Read More
11 August 2017

CLOSING FEEDBACK LOOPS IN SINDUKOT

Sindukot, in Sindhupalchowk district, is a mere 70 kilometers from Kathmandu, but the roads leading to the district are so ...

Read More
18 May 2017

A Day in Kumpur

The village of Kumpur, Dhading is just 75 kilometers from Kathmandu, but more often than not it’s been without access ...

Read More